Switzerland

Swiss naming of suspected tax evaders causes waves

Switzerland has long been a target for international attacks on account of all the „dirty money” deposited there. Without a doubt, for centuries it found its way to the private Swiss banks, famous for their reliability and discretion. As a result, it is hardly surprising that the amount of funds and the size of the assets being administered are considerable, even by international standards. The amounts we are talking about are well worth fighting over. As one of my favourite lawyers once said: „They don’t slaughter the little pigs when they’re still little, but when they’re fat and juicy…” In 2009, the Swiss paid a 780 million dollar fine to the United States following the infamous UBS affair. To me, the news which broke this week that the Swiss authorities are publishing the details of alleged tax evaders on the internet when they receive international requests for information appears to be the continuation of this. They are picking on the country because they have something worth taking, after all we are talking about hundreds of billions of dollars. I have also heard people saying that the details are being published to give the clients the chance to act, to take precautions, in order to avoid even bigger problems. But the problem is already very big; unfortunately, it looks like the Swiss bridges are burning, and although they have been trying to put out the fires for years, they just keep on burning…


The Commented News

Switzerland has come under fire for naming foreign account holders who are under investigation for tax fraud in their own countries. The practice, which has been ongoing for some years, is, ironically, intended to benefit the accused, reports Swiss Info.

It has hit the news headlines once again after the Swiss tax authorities named Francisco José Ortiz von Bismarck, a descendant of former German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck, in connection with a German probe.

The Swiss Federal Tax Administration told swissinfo.ch that it is obliged by law to inform account holders that it is cooperating with international requests for information in relation to tax investigations.

Usually, the account holder’s bank would get in touch with its client. This is to give the individual the opportunity to appeal the decision to cooperate with the Swiss courts.

But in some cases the bank has lost touch with the client and no longer has an up-to-date address. In such cases the tax authorities notify the account holder via the government’s online gazette – sometimes giving the full name of the client and in other instances just the initials and date of birth.

In each case the posting informs the person that they have 30 days to appeal to the St Gallen administrative court if they want to block the handover of their information.

A change to the Swiss law last year allows the tax authorities to withhold from the account holder the fact that it is cooperating with a foreign jurisdiction. But this applies only under certain circumstances, such as when the requesting country feels the person under investigation may destroy evidence.

Irony

The case of Bismarck has prompted a welter of media headlines, ranging from Germany, India and the United States.

The practice has certainly raised some eyebrows in Germany. “The fight against tax evasion is not about pillorying individuals, but about giving the majority of honest tax payers a sense of justice,” Nils Schmid, finance minister of the German state of Baden-Württemberg, told the Swiss News Agency.

The irony has not been lost on the world’s media that Switzerland – until recently home to some of the strictest banking secrecy laws in the world – has taken to publishing the names of suspected tax cheats for all the world to see.

But this is certainly not the first time that the open publication of suspected tax cheats’ identities has made the headlines. Last year, the name of former French football captain Marcel Desailly appeared on the Swiss government gazette.

Beat Furrer, spokesman for the Federal Tax Administration, said that while posting names on the Swiss government gazette is nothing new, the volume of instances has been on the increase.

“Statistically speaking, over the past three to four years we have received more requests for information,” he told swissinfo.ch.

Information exchange

Switzerland has committed to applying the system of automatic exchange of tax information by the start of 2018. On Tuesday, without debate, the 28 EU member states approved a treaty that would support the automatic exchange of information between the EU countries and Switzerland. On Wednesday in Brussels the State Secretary for International Financial Matters, Jacques de Watteville, will sign the document on behalf of Switzerland.

Beginning in 2017, Swiss financial institutions will be expected to collect tax data about individuals and forward it to the Swiss tax authorities for exchange with tax authorities in other EU countries. Similarly, EU member states will be required to provide tax information to Switzerland.

On Tuesday in Geneva, de Watteville said the contract would help smooth out relations between the EU and Switzerland.

Fines

The move toward automatic exchange of information followed intense global criticism of Switzerland’s financial centre over the past few years.

In 2009, UBS bank was fined US$780 million (CHF740 million) in the US after admitting that it helped clients evade taxes. Since then, several other Swiss banks have been fined or even forced to close their doors as a result of US pressure. Several more await fines from the Department of Justice.

Switzerland has also been forced to revise its laws to classify tax evasion as a crime and comply with international standards of tax cooperation.

Source: www.ifcreview.com